FAQ

No. Australian family law does not apply a fixed 50/50 rule. Under the _Family Law Act 1975_ (Cth), the court follows a structured multi-step process, assessing contributions and future needs to reach an outcome that is just and equitable.

Not necessarily. A BFA is only enforceable if strict statutory requirements are met, including independent legal advice. Courts may set aside an agreement where there is fraud, non-disclosure, or procedural unfairness.

Not always. Even with a valid will, eligible family members may bring family provision claims. Proper estate planning can reduce risk, but it cannot entirely eliminate disputes.

It depends. Succession laws vary across jurisdictions, and a single will may not be effective worldwide. Cross-border estates often require coordinated legal advice.

Yes. A shareholders’ agreement provides clarity on control, decision-making, exit mechanisms and dispute resolution, helping to reduce risk if relationships deteriorate.

Yes, in certain circumstances. Under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), directors owe statutory duties, and breaches may result in personal liability.

Not always. Some states provide a cooling-off period, though conditions vary. Buyers should understand their contractual obligations before signing.

Co-ownership disputes may be resolved through negotiation, mediation or court proceedings, including orders for sale or adjustment of interests.

In many matters, parties are encouraged or required to attempt alternative dispute resolution before litigation, failing which cost consequences may apply.

Generally no. Limitation periods apply to most claims, and failure to act in time may bar proceedings.

Not necessarily. Reapplication depends on the refusal reasons, visa type, and review rights. In some cases, an incorrect reapplication may increase legal risk.

Some decisions may be subject to administrative review or judicial review, but not all decisions are reviewable and strict time limits apply.

No. An investigation does not amount to a charge, but actions taken during this stage may significantly affect future proceedings.

Generally yes, but the right to silence is not absolute and may be limited in specific circumstances.

No. Termination must comply with the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), and unlawful dismissal may expose employers to legal claims.

Not necessarily. Courts assess the true nature of the working relationship, not just the contract label.